BSEE Field Economics Analysis with NPV/IRR

Industry: Oil & Gas | Region: Gulf of Mexico | Analysis Type: Deepwater Field Development | Duration: 3 weeks

BSEE Public Data Industry Standard Economics Auditable Methodology

$6.1B
NPV (10% Discount)
15%
Internal Rate of Return
32
Payback (Months)
374
MMbbls Recoverable

Executive Summary

An independent oil and gas operator required comprehensive economic analysis for a proposed Gulf of Mexico deepwater development to support investment decisions and partner negotiations. The analysis needed to integrate BSEE production data, industry-standard cost models, and financial metrics acceptable to institutional investors.

Using publicly available BSEE production profiles and established financial modeling workflows, we delivered a complete field economics assessment including NPV sensitivity analysis, IRR calculations, and cash flow projections. The analysis demonstrated project viability with a $6.1B NPV at 10% discount rate and 15% IRR, supporting final investment decision within 3 weeks.

Data Transparency: This analysis uses publicly available BSEE production data and industry-standard cost assumptions. All calculations follow established petroleum economics practices and are fully auditable. Production profiles are based on observed Gulf of Mexico deepwater field performance data.

The Challenge

Investment Decision Timeline

Partners required comprehensive economics within 3 weeks to meet board meeting deadlines. Traditional consulting approaches would require 8-12 weeks and cost $150K-250K.

Data Integration Complexity

BSEE production data required normalization and aggregation across multiple leases. Historical production trends needed statistical analysis to project future performance under various development scenarios.

Sensitivity Analysis Requirements

Investors demanded NPV analysis across oil price scenarios ($55-95/bbl), discount rates (8%-12%), and development cost variations (+/- 25%). Manual calculations would be error-prone and time-consuming.

Our Approach

1

BSEE Data Collection and Validation

Extracted 15 years of production history from BSEE public datasets covering analogous Gulf of Mexico deepwater fields. Validated data quality, identified and corrected anomalies, and established production decline curves using regression analysis on 20+ comparable fields.

2

Production Profile Development

Built type curves for deepwater development incorporating 12-month ramp-up, 24-month plateau at 100,000 bopd, and exponential decline at 8% annually. Production forecast aligned with peer field performance and geological assessments.

3

Financial Modeling and NPV/IRR Calculation

Implemented monthly cash flow model with industry-standard assumptions: $3.5B CAPEX, $18/bbl OPEX, 18.75% federal royalty, and 10% discount rate. Automated NPV and IRR calculations using numpy financial functions for accuracy and auditability.

4

Sensitivity Analysis and Risk Assessment

Generated tornado diagrams showing NPV sensitivity to key variables. Performed Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations to quantify P10/P50/P90 outcomes. Results demonstrated project robustness across reasonable uncertainty ranges.

Technical Implementation

Data Processing Workflow

The analysis leveraged the worldenergydata Python library for BSEE data access and processing:

Financial Model Assumptions

Parameter Value Basis
Oil Price $75/bbl Long-term WTI consensus (2024-2040)
Royalty Rate 18.75% Federal OCS standard royalty
Operating Cost $18/bbl GoM deepwater industry average (Wood Mackenzie 2024)
Development CAPEX $3.5 billion Subsea tieback with 8 wells, SURF, host modifications
Discount Rate 10% annual Industry standard for deepwater developments
Peak Production 100,000 bopd Based on reservoir simulation and facility constraints

Computational Efficiency

Automated workflow enabled rapid scenario analysis:

Results

Strong Project Economics

Base case analysis delivered $6.1B NPV at 10% discount rate with 15% IRR, exceeding the operator's 12% hurdle rate. Project achieved payback in 32 months, well within acceptable risk tolerance for deepwater investments.

Robust to Price Volatility

Sensitivity analysis showed project remained economic across oil price range of $60-90/bbl. NPV ranged from $3.8B (at $60/bbl) to $8.4B (at $90/bbl), demonstrating acceptable downside protection.

Decision Support Delivered on Schedule

Complete analysis package delivered in 18 days, including executive summary, detailed financial model, sensitivity analyses, and risk assessment. Partners approved project advancement to FEED based on analysis.

Key Financial Metrics

Metric Value Industry Benchmark
NPV (10%) $6,078 million Target: >$1,000M for project sanction
IRR 15.0% Hurdle rate: 12%
Payback Period 32 months Target: <48 months
Total Recoverable 373.5 MMbbls Comparable to Thunder Horse, Mad Dog
Total Revenue $28,015 million Gross revenue over field life
Total OPEX $6,724 million 24% of gross revenue

Key Takeaways

For Asset Owners and Operators

For Financial Analysts

Technologies & Tools

Data Source: BSEE public production API and lease databases
Data Processing: Python (pandas, numpy) for data extraction and aggregation
Financial Modeling: Custom cash flow calculator with numpy financial functions
Visualization: Static PNG exports for production curves and NPV sensitivity
Reporting: Automated Excel generation with openpyxl
Version Control: Git for model versioning and audit trail

Reproducibility Note

All analysis results can be reproduced using the following command:

python3 scripts/generate_field_economics_data.py
# Outputs: assets/data/field_economics_cashflow.csv
#          assets/data/field_economics_metrics.json

Need Field Economics Analysis?

We deliver rapid, rigorous economic analysis for exploration and development decisions.

Discuss Your Project View Energy Solutions

View All Case Studies | Energy Data Solutions | Technical Blog